Page 24 of 24

Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:18 pm
by Maturin
Wrathbone wrote:
Thu Sep 10, 2020 11:03 am
Have they somehow convinced Alonso that they could be competetive with the rule changes in 2022?
It can happen. Back when Hamilton joined the underperforming Mercedes team in 2012 I was one of the few voices who suggested their longterm plans could have indicated future performance, and convinced him to join. You never know!

Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:23 pm
by Raid
Drarok wrote:
Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:47 am
I'd much rather see other drivers go than Perez! Grosjean immediately comes to mind. Alonso and Raikkonen should probably retire rather than taking seats that up-and-coming drivers could have instead, too.
I have to agree. Grosjean doesn't feel particularly interested in the sport these days, nor does Kimi. At least Alonso cares, even if it's as much about himself as the racing.

Perez hyad been one of those drivers who could capitalise on front runners having problems, and I'll always remember him dragging that Sauber onto the podium when the tyres would have been down to the canvas for anyone else. I'd be sad to see him leave three sport when there are less deserving drivers on the grid. He may bring money to the team, but I really don't class him as a pay driver.

Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:58 pm
by Wrathbone
Maturin wrote:
Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:18 pm
Wrathbone wrote:
Thu Sep 10, 2020 11:03 am
Have they somehow convinced Alonso that they could be competetive with the rule changes in 2022?
It can happen. Back when Hamilton joined the underperforming Mercedes team in 2012 I was one of the few voices who suggested their longterm plans could have indicated future performance, and convinced him to join. You never know!
I'd love it if Renault did have something special in the works, and 2022 should be a big shake up regardless. I'm unconvinced so far mainly because of how they played up their chances a couple of years ago and it wasn't exactly their best season, and also because Alonso has a knack for making the wrong team moves.

Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 6:28 pm
by Rossell
The Tuscan grand prix. Was utterly bonkers.


Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 7:34 pm
by Raid
It was a better race than I was expecting, but with only one overtaking spot for F1 cars it was predictable outside of the chaos of the safety cars and restarts. Has there ever been a Grand Prix with three standing starts? I'm glad to see Albon get his first podium; the lad always seems to get his positions the hard way by overtaking around the outside.

I do think it was amusing that the Ferrari-red Mercedes safety car lead more laps than the Alfa-red Ferraris at Ferrari's 1000th Grand Prix at the Ferrari-owned Mugello circuit. It just seems that every time someone celebrates a birthday or anniversary in F1, they have terrible luck.

Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 8:16 pm
by DjchunKfunK
Yeah without the incidents I think it would have been a fairly dull race, as is usually the case nowadays. I have to say though it was nice to see a course with gravel traps that punish drivers for making mistakes, I've got so used to huge run-off areas that allow drivers to mess up and just come back onto the track.

Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 6:36 am
by Wrathbone
It’s a double-edged sword, though, because the likes of Verstappen get a DNF through no fault of their own. He had a heavy shunt from behind, but there’s a good chance he could have continued if he hadn’t been beached. And considering the reasonable performance Red Bull had, he might have had a look at the Mercs.

Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 7:03 am
by Raid
I'm fairly sure Max would have retired yesterday anyway; he'd already lost about ten places off the line because of an engine issue. I know there was an incident behind him, but I get the feeling that he was slow when he was hit, and he would have escaped the incident had he been at his full racing speed.

But honestly I'm in two minds about the runoffs; there needs to be a risk/reward equation for drivers to push against, but on balance I'd prefer more runners in a race than cars beached in a gravel trap requiring a safety car to remove (and after the Jules Bianchi crash, I think they're basically a guaranteed SC or VSC now).

Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 9:14 am
by DjchunKfunK
Wrathbone wrote:
Mon Sep 14, 2020 6:36 am
It’s a double-edged sword, though, because the likes of Verstappen get a DNF through no fault of their own. He had a heavy shunt from behind, but there’s a good chance he could have continued if he hadn’t been beached. And considering the reasonable performance Red Bull had, he might have had a look at the Mercs.
Max said he would have had to retire anyway so the shunt was immaterial to him being out of the race.

Personally I think the huge run-off areas have allowed drivers to get away with poor driving over the years, I think you see a lot more mistakes in races than you used to but there is no punishment as they can just drive back onto the course again. They also allow people to take unnecessary risks sometimes especially at the start, they know that if things don't go right they can use the run-off areas to escape so a mad lunge down the inside or really late breaking gets punished much less often than if there were gravel traps at more circuits.

Re: The F1 thread

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:23 am
by arqueturus
Re: The run off areas, it's an interesting contradiction between bike and car racing - the gravel is needed to slow bikes down to prevent serious injuries and the opposite is the case for cars as they can no longer steer/brake once they're in there.

Cataluyna was modied with the removal of certain sand/gravel traps to assist F1 and that modification resulted in the death of Luis Salom in 2017 when he crashed and didn't slow down at all. It's one of the main reasons that bikes and cars can't always share tracks that much.