Thanks man!
I've thought about this, and the honest answer is I think either way is equally fine, the intention was that it would be a bit of an introduction to the series and maybe pull in some more readers who might be put off jumping straight into a trilogy.
It covers events that I hint at ever so slightly in both other books (mainly as when I wrote them I knew
something had happened but was still unclear on the precise details), and so I think it's quite cool to have read those and then come to this and go 'ah, so that's where so-and-so met thingy and that was the thing they did', but it's not essential by any means and hopefully works just as well as the starting point.
It's also shorter, about a quarter of the length of my first one, so if you read it and hate it you've just saved yourself a bunch of time
